Quasi-Optimization of Uplink Power for Enabling Green URLLC in Mobile UAV-Assisted IoT Networks: A Perturbation-Based Approach
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Efficient resource allocation can maximize power efficiency, which is an important performance metric in future fifth-generation (5G) communications. The minimization of sum uplink power in order to enable green communications while concurrently fulfilling the strict demands of ultrareliability for short packets is an essential and central challenge that needs to be addressed in the design of 5G and subsequent wireless communication systems. To address this challenge, this article analyzes the joint optimization of various unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) systems parameters, including the UAV’s position, height, beamwidth, and the resource allocation for uplink communications between ground Internet-of-Things (IoT) devices and a UAV employing short ultrareliable and low-latency (URLLC) data packets. Toward achieving the aforesaid task, we proposed a perturbation-based iterative optimization to minimize the sum uplink power in order to determine the optimal position for the UAV, its height, beamwidth of its antenna, and the blocklength allocated for each IoT device. It is shown that the proposed algorithm has lower time complexity, yields better performance than other benchmark algorithms, and achieves similar performance to exhaustive search. Moreover, the results also demonstrate that Shannon’s formula is not an optimum choice for modeling sum power for short packets as it can significantly underestimate the sum power, where our calculations show that there is an average difference of 47.51% for the given parameters between our proposed approach and Shannon’s formula. Finally, our results confirm that the proposed algorithm allows ultrahigh reliability for all the users and converges rapidly.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".