MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Quantitative Statistical Evaluation of Micro Residual Oil after Polymer Flooding Based on X-ray Micro Computed-Tomography Scanning

2020· article· en· W3046995003 on OpenAlexaff
Yongfei Yang, Tao Liu, Stefan Iglauer, S. Hossein Hejazi, Jun Yao, Wenjie Zhang, Kai Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy & Fuels · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Shandong ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsResidual oilPolymerResidualMaterials sciencePermeability (electromagnetism)Viscous fingeringEnhanced oil recoveryPetroleum engineeringComposite materialPorosityChemical engineeringPorous mediumChemistryGeologyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Polymer flooding is an important tertiary recovery method. However, even after its application, more than 50% of the oil remains in the formation layers. It is thus important for efficient resource use that both residual oil distribution and the mechanisms associated with polymer flooding are better understood. In the work described in this paper, a series of in situ X-ray tomography experiments were carried out, and different displacement stages were imaged. Then, rock, water, oil, and polymer were identified in the imagery and quantified, while interchanges among the different types of residual oil, and their associated microscopic polymer displacement mechanisms, were discussed. We also studied the impact of permeability on polymer flooding efficiency, and our results showed that polymer flooding could mobilize residual oil that was not accessible via water flooding. Mechanistically, the polymer flood caused the big continuous residual oil clusters to split, dispersing them into smaller clusters. The polymer also changed fluid flow pathways, thus increasing sweep efficiency, while its viscoelasticity was helpful for recovering singlet and film residual types of oil. We found that the polymer could only drive oil locally, and that a large amount of residual oil remained in the middle of the core. We also noted that polymer flooding was more effective for higher permeability samples, which showed that, after polymer flooding, the recovery rate for the samples with permeabilities of 3989, 1543, and 814 millidarcys (mD) were enhanced by 10.13, 6.30, and 4.34%, respectively. Higher permeability samples remained as network-type and multiple-type residual oils after polymer flooding, while samples with lower permeability showed multiple-type and singlet-type residual oils. Thus, our results and conclusions showed that different enhanced oil recovery methods could be applied for further development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations41
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnergy & FuelsSame topicEnhanced Oil Recovery TechniquesFrench-language works237,207