MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3047110932 · doi:10.1109/jsen.2020.3014073

A Monolithic Amorphous-Selenium/CMOS Visible-Light Imager With Sub-9-μm Pixel Pitch and Extended Full-Well Capacity

2020· article· en· W3047110932 on OpenAlexafffund
Yun Zhe Li, Mohamed Hamid, Christopher C. Scott, Rhiannon Lohr, Abdallah El-Falou, Peter M. Levine, Karim S. Karim

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Sensors Journal · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCCD and CMOS Imaging Sensors
Canadian institutionsConcordia UniversityUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Foundation for InnovationCMC Microsystems
KeywordsDot pitchCMOSOptoelectronicsPixelDark currentMaterials scienceImage sensorCapacitorCMOS sensorPhysicsOpticsPhotodetector

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a monolithic hybrid visible-light imager composed of an amorphous selenium (a-Se) photoconductor thin film integrated on a CMOS active pixel sensor (APS) array readout integrated circuit. We achieve more than 14-dB signal-to-noise ratio under monochromatic light at an illuminance of 0.04 lux in one quadrant of the imager containing 7.8×7.8-μ m2pixels using a 1.6-s exposure (integration) time without operating the a-Se sensor in avalanche mode. Long integration times are made possible by exploiting the low dark-current of a 20-μm-thick a-Se sensor layer and by implementing dark-current reduction techniques in the APS, such as series stacking reset and protection devices. In addition, use of a relatively thick 20-μm a-Se layer obviates the need for an additional planarization step of the sensing layer as was done with a previously-reported avalanche-mode a-Se/CMOS imager that incorporated a 0.5-μm-thick sensing layer. We also demonstrate an improved APS design, with 7.8 × 8.7- μ m2dimensions, containing a programmable in-pixel integration capacitor to provide enhanced full-well capacity (FWC) for a-Se/CMOS imagers. Measured results show that our APS achieves a FWC of approximately 230 ke-, which is comparable to several previously-reported photodiode-based CMOS imagers with extended FWC. Our imager can also resolve an effective object size of approximately 12.5μm, demonstrated through measurement of the modulation transfer function.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Sensors JournalSame topicCCD and CMOS Imaging SensorsFrench-language works237,207