MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3047124195 · doi:10.7202/1070435ar

Une naissance excentrique. L’influence de Sterne sur Töpffer, Cham et Doré

2020· article· fr· W3047124195 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Thierry Smolderen

Bibliographic record

VenueRecherches sémiotiques · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicComics and Graphic Narratives
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Si l’on remonte aux sources graphiques de ce que Hoberman a appelé le modernisme vulgaire, l’influence du Tristram Shandy de Sterne sur les premiers albums de Cham et Gustave Doré apparaît déterminante à l’âge romantique. Durant les années 1840 et 1850, en effet, ces deux auteurs ont pris le relais des histoires en images de Töpffer en y introduisant des facéties réflexives typiquement sterniennes. Tout en identifiant les facteurs qui ont contribué à inscrire durablement cet esprit de réflexivité ludique dans la tradition de dessin humoristique (jusqu’aux comics du 20e siècle), nous essayerons de comprendre pourquoi l’on ne trouve aucune trace apparente de ce genre de jeux dans les histoires de « l’inventeur de la bande dessinée », alors que Töpffer lui-même était un grand lecteur de Sterne.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.905
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.137
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRecherches sémiotiquesSame topicComics and Graphic NarrativesFrench-language works237,207