Traffic Flow Prediction Using SPGAPSO-CKRVM Model
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Traffic flow prediction is popular research of ITS. Traffic flow prediction models based on machine learning have recently been widely applied. In this study, we use machine learning algorithms, heuristic algorithms, and parallelization technology to propose a traffic flow prediction model based on Relevance Vector Machine called Genetic Algorithm and Particle Swarm Optimization based on spark parallelization optimized Combined kernel RVM (SPGAPSO-CKRVM). First, combined kernel functions are constructed based on common kernel functions. Second, a parameter optimization algorithm is proposed to optimize the parameters of combined kernel functions by Genetic Algorithm and Particle Swarm Optimization. To reduce time consumed by the parameter optimization algorithm, we parallel the parameter optimization algorithm by Spark. Finally, the proposed model is verified with the real data of Whitemud Drive in Canada. The experimental results indicate that SPGAPSO-CKRVM has greater accuracy than other prediction models and parallelization technology reduce time consumed by the parameter optimization algorithm significantly.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".