MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3047181607 · doi:10.3917/lsdlc.hs09.0137

Mon histoire de spectateur

2020· article· fr· W3047181607 on OpenAlexaff
Joël Kerouanton

Bibliographic record

VenueLe sujet dans la cité · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFrench Urban and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsMinistère de l’Emploi et de la Solidarité Sociale (Québec)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le parcours de spectateur, aussi banal qu’il puisse paraître dans l’histoire d’une vie, peut recouvrir de multiples strates de savoirs sensibles. En faisant appel à l’écriture créative – seule façon de donner à voir les territoires de l’ambiguïté –, l’auteur met en récit sa sensation originelle d’idiotie culturelle, puis son choc émancipateur face à des formes esthétiques produites en présence de corps hors-normes. Les spectacles devenant un médium pour se regarder dans le monde et regarder le monde, l’auteur en fera usage dans le champ social puis dans le champ culturel, non sans résistance. Porté par l’imaginaire de communautés interprétatives de spectateurs, l’auteur concevra des dispositifs participatifs alimentant Le Dico du spectateur , une typologie de spectateur générant des définitions théorico-rigolotes – fil rouge de ce récit.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.815
Threshold uncertainty score0.972

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLe sujet dans la citéSame topicFrench Urban and Social StudiesFrench-language works237,207