Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A new multi‐illuminant synthetic image test set called MIST is described and made publicly available. MIST is intended primarily for evaluating illumination estimation and color constancy methods, but additional data are provided to make it useful for other computer vision applications as well. MIST addresses the problem found in most existing real‐image datasets, which is that the groundtruth illumination is only measured at a very limited number of locations, despite the fact that illumination tends to vary significantly in almost all scenes. In contrast, MIST provides for each pixel: (a) the percent surface spectral reflectance, (b) the spectrum of the incident illumination, (c) the separate specular and diffuse components of the reflected light, and (d) the depth (ie, camera‐to‐surface distance). The dataset contains 900 stereo pairs, each of the 1800 images being a 30‐band multispectral image covering the visible spectrum from 400 to 695 nm at a 5 nm interval. Standard sRGB versions of the multispectral images are also provided. The images are synthesized by extending the Blender Cycles ray‐tracing renderer. The rendering is done in a way that ensures the images are not only photorealistic, but physically accurate as well.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".