MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3047222590 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.pedca19-a46

Abstract A46: Charting the synthetic lethality landscape in pediatric cancer to advance whole-exome precision-based treatments

2020· article· en· W3047222590 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Fiorella Schischlik, Joo Sang Lee, Nirali N. Shah, Rosandra N. Kaplan, Carol J. Thiele, Brigitte C. Widemann, Eytan Ruppin

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeuroblastoma Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSynthetic lethalityCancerExomeGenePediatric cancerComputational biologyCRISPRExome sequencingRNA interferenceBiologyMedicineBioinformaticsGeneticsPhenotypeDNA repair

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract One of the challenges in pediatric cancer (PC) research is that cancers in children are uncommon and are quite different from adults. Much of the research in adult cancers is focused on studying cancer driver genes, aiming at their therapeutic targeting. However, PCs are often driven by relatively few genetic alterations that are distinct from those that occur in adult cancers. Here we apply a novel data-driven approach to identify the synthetic lethality (SL) networks of several different pediatric cancers. These provide a new platform for discovering novel vulnerabilities in primary tumors from PCs that extends previous approaches commonly used in adult cancer. SL interactions denote the relationship between two genes whose combined inactivation is lethal to the cell, while their individual inactivation is not. To identify the SL landscape characteristic of a specific pediatric cancer, we mined the relevant pediatric cell line and patients’ tumor data in the TARGET database. Our computational framework consists of four inference steps: For SL interactions, we first identify putative SL gene pairs from the pediatric cell line dependency map generated by in vitro RNAi/CRISPR screens (depmap). Second, among the candidate gene pairs that pass the first step, we select those gene pairs whose co-inactivation is under-represented in pediatric tumors, indicating that they are selected against. Third, we further prioritize candidate SL pairs whose co-inactivation is associated with better prognosis, indicating that they may hamper tumor progression. Finally, we prioritize SL paired genes with similar evolutionary phylogenetic profiles. Applying this approach to analyze TARGET data, we identify the first genome-wide SL networks in five pediatric tumors including Wilms’ tumor, neuroblastoma, AML, ALL, and osteosarcoma. The predicted SL interactions are first tested and validated via experimental in vitro CRISPR screens. Second, we show that the PC specific SL networks are predictive of drug response in pediatric cell lines but not in adult cell lines of the corresponding tumor type. These results establish that the predicted SL interactions offer an exciting venue for developing predictive biomarkers specific for PC treatments. Importantly, these predictions were performed in an unsupervised manner, reducing the known risk of over-fitting and lack of generalizability commonly associated with supervised prediction methods. Notably, our analysis identifies many SL partners of key drivers of PCs such as WT1, MYCN, and ATRX, and the key interactions discovered include ATRX-MAP kinases, MYCN-CDC6 (cell cycle regulation), and DNMT1-HK2. These provide novel selective drug target candidates for the tumors driven by these genes and lay a basis for new treatment combinations. Taken together, these results lay a basis for a new paradigm for whole-exome SL-based precision treatments in pediatric oncology, complementing existing mutation- and fusion-based approaches. Citation Format: Fiorella Schischlik, Joo Sang Lee, Nirali Shah, Rosandra N. Kaplan, Carol J. Thiele, Brigitte Widemann, Eytan Ruppin. Charting the synthetic lethality landscape in pediatric cancer to advance whole-exome precision-based treatments [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on the Advances in Pediatric Cancer Research; 2019 Sep 17-20; Montreal, QC, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(14 Suppl):Abstract nr A46.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.095
GPT teacher head0.435
Teacher spread0.340 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicNeuroblastoma Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207