MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3047232895 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.pedca19-b32

Abstract B32: ASAP1 regulates differentiation in myoblasts and PAX-FOXO1 fusion-negative rhabdomyosarcoma

2020· article· en· W3047232895 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Katie E. Hebron, Olivia Feehan-Nelson, Xiaoying Jian, Sofia A. Girald, Paul A. Randazzo, Marielle E. Yohe

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCancer researchDifferentiation therapyRhabdomyosarcomaBiologyC2C12MetastasisCell biologyMyogenesisCancerMyocyteMedicineSarcomaAcute promyelocytic leukemiaPathologyCell cultureGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS), the most frequently diagnosed soft-tissue sarcoma in children, is caused by a differentiation defect in skeletal muscle precursor cells. Despite aggressive, multimodal therapies, the prognosis for recurrent PAX-FOXO1 fusion-negative RMS (FN-RMS) remains poor. Inducing differentiation in diseases defined by defective differentiation programs has led to curative therapies in cancers such as acute promyelocytic leukemia. A recent study showed that inducing differentiation slowed tumor growth and extended survival in a xenograft model of FN-RMS, identifying differentiation as a promising therapeutic target in FN-RMS. However, genes associated with differentiation are frequently found to be hijacked by tumor cells and repurposed for proinvasive programs. Therefore, better understanding of differentiation signaling and its relation to invasion could reveal novel therapeutic opportunities for patients with advanced FN-RMS. We hypothesize that ASAP1, an Arf GTPase-activating protein implicated in differentiation in normal cells and invasion in carcinoma, promotes progression by controlling proinvasive elements of differentiation signaling through focal adhesion assembly. ASAP1, an Arf GTPase-activating protein (Arf GAP), regulates integrin adhesion complexes, critical regulators of biologic processes such as proliferation, migration, and differentiation that are commonly dysregulated in cancer. ASAP1 is overexpressed in several cancers and correlates with increased metastasis and poor patient prognosis but has also been shown to promote differentiation. The mechanisms by which ASAP1 affects cancer progression and differentiation and the relationship between these effects are not yet understood. We found that ASAP1 is overexpressed in FN-RMS. ASAP1 overexpression inhibits proliferation in myoblasts, but not in FN-RMS. Knockdown of ASAP1 inhibits differentiation in both myoblast and FN-RMS cell lines, while overexpression enhances differentiation. Moreover, gene set enrichment analysis shows that myoblast differentiation-associated genes fail to become enriched upon knockdown of ASAP1. Finally, knockdown of Arf1 and Arf5, established binding partners of ASAP1, also blocks differentiation of FN-RMS cell lines, indicating that ASAP1 may regulate differentiation through its interaction with Arf GTPases. These data support our hypothesis that ASAP1 regulates the continuum of differentiation and invasion in FN-RMS. As a continuing test of the hypothesis, future studies will investigate focal adhesion assembly, dynamics, and signaling, which are processes known to be affected by ASAP1, as a mechanism for ASAP1-mediated regulation of myoblast differentiation. Citation Format: Katie E. Hebron, Olivia Feehan-Nelson, Xiaoying Jian, Sofia A. Girald, Paul A. Randazzo, Marielle E. Yohe. ASAP1 regulates differentiation in myoblasts and PAX-FOXO1 fusion-negative rhabdomyosarcoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on the Advances in Pediatric Cancer Research; 2019 Sep 17-20; Montreal, QC, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(14 Suppl):Abstract nr B32.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.087
GPT teacher head0.388
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicSarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→