The Center of City Function in Guiyang, China: An Evaluation with Emerging Data
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In recent years, the center of city function has increasingly come into notice of the scholars, conforming to their purpose to describe the spatial structure of the city center more comprehensively. In this study, points of interest (POI) served as observation data to construct a framework for identifying and evaluating city function centers. As a typical plateau mountain city in western China, Guiyang possesses extremely special research value in urban planning and construction. The results of this study show that: the number of city function centers increased from 2016 to 2018, which manifested as polycentricity; their changes can be described in terms of quantity, pattern, and location; their morphological types were "relatively concentrated" and "relatively dispersed" in the process of urban evolution; and the types of location change were mainly displacement and splitting; spatial statistical analysis indicates that the change trend of city function centers will also be polycentric growth. In addition, the results of the study will have a positive impact on the subsequent urban planning and construction of Guiyang.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it