MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3047309139 · doi:10.1177/2054358120944271

Canadian Society of Nephrology Commentary on the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes 2017 Clinical Practice Guideline Update for the Diagnosis, Evaluation, Prevention, and Treatment of Chronic Kidney Disease-Mineral and Bone Disorder

2020· article· en· W3047309139 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Rachel M. Holden, Reem A. Mustafa, R. Todd Alexander, Marisa Battistella, Micheli Bevilacqua, Greg Knoll, Fabrice Mac‐Way, Martina Reslerova, Ron Wald, Philip D. Acott, Patrick Feltmate, Allan Grill, Kailash Jindal, Meena Karsanji, Bryce Kiberd, S. Sara Mahdavi, Kailee McCarron, Amber O. Molnar, Maury Pinsk, Celia Rodd, Steven Soroka, Amanda J. Vinson, Deborah Zimmerman, Catherine M. Clase

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicParathyroid Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaCanadian Nutrition SocietyThe Scarborough HospitalHamilton Health SciencesDalhousie UniversityUniversity of ManitobaSt. Michael's HospitalSt. Boniface HospitalHealth Sciences CentreUniversity Health NetworkOttawa HospitalUniversity of British ColumbiaManitoba HealthUniversité LavalUniversity of AlbertaQueen's UniversityMcMaster UniversityUniversity of TorontoHôtel-Dieu de QuébecChildren's Hospital Research Institute of ManitobaNova Scotia Health AuthorityVancouver Coastal HealthImpact
FundersJanssen BiotechHealth CanadaOPKO HealthPatient-Centered Outcomes Research InstituteBaxter InternationalSanofiBoehringer IngelheimAmgenSanofi GenzymeAmerican Society of HematologyOtsuka Canada PharmaceuticalMinistry of Health, Ontario
KeywordsMedicineKidney diseaseGuidelineNephrologyVitamin D and neurologyIntensive care medicineInternal medicineClinical PracticeParathyroid hormonePhysical therapyPathologyCalcium

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: (1) To provide commentary on the 2017 update to the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) 2017 Clinical Practice Guideline Update for the Diagnosis, Evaluation, Prevention, and Treatment of Chronic Kidney Disease-Mineral and Bone Disorder (CKD-MBD); (2) to apply the evidence-based guideline update for implementation within the Canadian health care system; (3) to provide comment on the care of children with chronic kidney disease (CKD); and (4) to identify research priorities for Canadian patients. SOURCES OF INFORMATION: The KDIGO 2017 Clinical Practice Guideline Update for the Diagnosis, Evaluation, Prevention, and Treatment of CKD-MBD. METHODS: The commentary committee co-chairs selected potential members based on their knowledge of the Canadian kidney community, aiming for wide representation from relevant disciplines, academic and community centers, and different geographical regions. KEY FINDINGS: We agreed with many of the recommendations in the clinical practice guideline on the diagnosis, evaluation, prevention, and treatment of CKD-MBD. However, based on the uncommon occurrence of abnormalities in calcium and phosphate and the low likelihood of severe abnormalities in parathyroid hormone (PTH), we recommend against screening and monitoring levels of calcium, phosphate, PTH, and alkaline phosphatase in adults with CKD G3. We suggest and recommend monitoring these parameters in adults with CKD G4 and G5, respectively. In children, we agree that monitoring for CKD-MBD should begin in CKD G2, but we suggest measuring ionized calcium, rather than total calcium or calcium adjusted for albumin. With regard to vitamin D, we suggest against routine screening for vitamin D deficiency in adults with CKD G3-G5 and G1T-G5T and suggest following population health recommendations for adequate vitamin D intake. We recommend that the measurement and management of bone mineral density (BMD) be according to general population guidelines in CKD G3 and G3T, but we suggest against routine BMD testing in CKD G4-G5, CKD G4T-5T, and in children with CKD. Based on insufficient data, we also recommend against routine bone biopsy in clinical practice for adults with CKD or CKD-T, or in children with CKD, although we consider it an important research tool. LIMITATIONS: The committee relied on the evidence summaries produced by KDIGO. The CSN committee did not replicate or update the systematic reviews.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.031
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.156
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.964
Threshold uncertainty score0.591

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0310.156
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.005
Bibliometrics0.0040.005
Science and technology studies0.0080.006
Scholarly communication0.0090.005
Open science0.0070.005
Research integrity0.0320.027
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0250.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.386
Teacher spread0.341 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2020
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Kidney Health and DiseaseSame topicParathyroid Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207