MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3047347388 · doi:10.7202/1070821ar

Politique des mains en vis-à-vis : le dessin comme processus de réflexion

2020· article· fr· W3047347388 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Adrien Genoudet

Bibliographic record

VenueRecherches sémiotiques · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicComics and Graphic Narratives
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Il s’agit d’approcher, dans cet article, la manière dont certains auteurs de bandes dessinées se réapproprient, par plusieurs procédés, des images déjà existantes. Ces images, appropriées et diluées par la pratique des dessinateurs nous permettent de comprendre différemment les jeux de miroirs stylistiques lorsqu’on les analyse dans le temps. Chaque reprise d’images, quelle qu’elle soit, est toujours un dialogue temporel avec l’Autre. En s’intéressant aux reprises de photographies dans des bandes dessinées ou aux montages et compositions de David Vandermeulen dans Fritz Haber , nous essayons de comprendre dans cet article, plus largement, le geste de la main du dessinateur prit comme un mouvement de vis-à-vis avec un autre créateur.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.604
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.205
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.145 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRecherches sémiotiquesSame topicComics and Graphic NarrativesFrench-language works237,207