MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3047359380 · doi:10.6001/energetika.v66i1.4294

Optimal energy management system for distribution systems using simultaneous integration of PV-based DG and DSTATCOM units

2020· article· en· W3047359380 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergetika · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrogrid Control and Optimization
Canadian institutionsConcordia UniversityÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParticle swarm optimizationPhotovoltaic systemAccelerationControl theory (sociology)Distributed generationComputer scienceMathematical optimizationEnergy management systemEnergy managementEnergy (signal processing)AlgorithmEngineeringMathematicsRenewable energyElectrical engineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The energy management system (EMS) of an electrical distribution system (EDS), with the integration of distributed generation (DG) and distribution static compensator (DSTATCOM), provides numerous benefits and significantly differs from the existing EDSs. This paper presents an optimal integration of DG based on photovoltaic (PV) solar panels and DSTATCOM in EDS. A single objective function, based on maximizing the active power loss level (APLL) in EDS, is deployed to find the optimal size and location of photovoltaic DG and DSTATCOM simultaneously in different study cases using various particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithms. These PSO algorithms are the basic PSO, adaptive acceleration coefficients PSO (AAC-PSO), autonomous particles groups for PSO (APG-PSO), nonlinear dynamic acceleration coefficients PSO (NDAC-PSO), sine cosine acceleration coefficients PSO (SCAC-PSO), and time-varying acceleration PSO (TVA-PSO). These algorithms are applied to the standard IEEE 33- and 69-bus EDSs, which are used as test systems to verify the effectiveness of the proposed algorithms. Simulation results prove that the TVA-PSO algorithm exhibits higher capability and efficiency in finding optimum solutions. Comparing the simulation results attained for different study cases leads to the conclusion that DG and DSTATCOM were optimally-allocated simultaneously, which resulted in a significant reduction of power losses and an enhancement of the voltage profile.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.971
Threshold uncertainty score0.484

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it