The mediating effect of auditor dysfunctional behavior on Machiavellian character and time budget pressure of audit quality
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to examine the auditor's dysfunctional behavior mediating the influence of Machiavellian characteristic and time budget pressure on audit behavior. This study took a sample of all auditors at the Public Accountant Office (KAP) of the Province of Bali. Determination of the sample was accomplished based on the nonprobability sampling method with saturated sample technique. The research sample was 94 auditors and questionnaires were distributed among them and managed to collect 65 questionnaires. Data analysis was performed using the path analysis model. The results show the auditor's dysfunctional behavior fully mediated the influence of Machiavellian traits on audit quality, while the auditor's dysfunctional behavior mediated the partial effect of time budget pressure on audit quality. The results of this study can be considered for auditors and input for IAPI in improving audit quality by suppressing and avoiding the auditor's dysfunctional behavior due to the influence of Machiavellian characteristic and time budget pressure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".