MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3047420256

Declive cognitivo de atención y memoria en adultos mayores sanos

2020· article· es· W3047420256 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
María Elena Flores Villavicencio, Melina Rodríguez Díaz, Guillermo González Pérez, José Raúl Robles Bañuelos, María Ana Valle Barbosae

Bibliographic record

VenueCuadernos de neuropsicología · 2020
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldMedicine
TopicAging, Health, and Disability
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyHumanitiesCognitionCognitive declineArtMedicineDementiaPsychiatry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

RESUMEN: Las funciones cognitivas que declinan normalmente durante el envejecimiento son la atencion y la memoria, una deteccion temprana podria disminuir su deterioro a pesar del avance de los anos. El objetivo es evaluar el declive cognitivo de las funciones de memoria y atencion en el proceso de envejecimiento normal en diferentes edades. Se seleccionaron tareas de memoria y atencion de las escalas “NEUROPSI” y de Montreal Cognitive Assesment “MOCA”. Se evaluaron 186 adultos mayores sanos, con una edad promedio de 61.14 anos, distribuidos en 4 grupos de acuerdo con la edad. Las tareas de mayor sensibilidad que declinan durante el envejecimiento normal fueron para la memoria T2, T3, T4 y las de atencion: T9, T10 y T12. El grupo de mayor edad G4-75 a 85 anos presento bajos puntajes en la realizacion de las tareas, existiendo diferencias estadisticamente significativas entre los diferentes grupos de edad, demostrando la existencia de una disminucion de atencion y memoria conforme avanza la edad. Palabras Clave: Funciones Cognitivas; Envejecimiento Normal; Adultos Mayores; Declive Cognitivo. ABSTRACT  The cognitive functions that normally decline during aging are attention and memory, early detection could decrease its deterioration despite the advance of years. The objective is to assess the cognitive decline of the functions of memory and attention in the process of normal aging at different ages. Memory and attention tasks were selected from the NEUROPSI and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment MOCA scales. The tasks of greater savings decline during normal aging were for T2, T3, T4 memory and attention: T9, T10 and T12. The Group of older G4-75 to 85 years had low scores in the accomplishment of the tasks, there are statistically significant differences between different age groups, demonstrating the existence of a decrease in attention and memory as advancing age. Key words: Cognitive Functions; Normal Aging; Older Adults; Cognitive Decline.  RESUMO  As funcoes cognitivas que declinam normalmente durante o envelhecimento sao a atencao e a memoria, uma deteccao precoce pode diminuir a sua deterioracao apesar do avanco dos anos. O objetivo e avaliar o declinio cognitivo das funcoes de memoria e atencao no processo de envelhecimento normal em diferentes idades. Foram selecionadas tarefas de memoria e atencao das escalas “NEUROPSI” e de Montreal Cognitive Assesment “MOCA”. Foram avaliados 186 adultos idosos saudaveis, com uma idade media de 61.14 anos, distribuidos em 4 grupos de acordo com a idade. As tarefas de maior sensibilidade que declinam durante o envelhecimento normal foram para a memoria T2, T3, T4 e as de atencao: T9, T10 e T12. O grupo de maior idade G4-75 a 85 anos apresentou baixas pontuacoes na realizacao das tarefas, existindo diferencas estatisticamente significativas entre os diferentes grupos etarios, demonstrando a existencia de uma diminuicao de atencao e memoria a medida que avanca a idade.  Palavras-chave: Funcoes cognitivas; Envelhecimento Normal; Adultos mais velhos; Declinio cognitivo

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCuadernos de neuropsicologíaSame topicAging, Health, and DisabilityFrench-language works237,207