MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3047423155 · doi:10.20381/ruor-25029

Vancouver - the Road Home: To Live in a Mobile Home on Canada’s West Coast

2020· dissertation· en· W3047423155 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
David McConville

Bibliographic record

VenueuO Research (University of Ottawa) · 2020
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeographyCartography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For the past number of years there has been an increase in mobile homes occupying city streets along Metro Vancouver and the West coast of Canada outside of permitted spaces. Their presence has been well noted by news organisations and internet platforms that routinely discuss their existence. The main question this thesis wishes to determine is why this phenomenon exists and what is propelling it to its current level of prominence. While such an unorthodox lifestyle is seen as a positive by some, others are weary of the social stigma surrounding mobile homes due to stereotypes of poverty that are often unfair. Based on a review of existing literature, observation notes and a series of interviews from eleven willing participants while in the Metro Vancouver area, I can say that one of the underlying pressures influencing people to live in a vehicular home in this region is the extreme gentrification responsible for high housing prices. In fact, urban mobile homes are part of a much larger trend of alternative housing strategies as minimalist living gains broader support to cut back on living costs. Despite these facts, mobile home dwellers come from all walks of life with different economic backgrounds and motivations. Thus, while lowering financial costs are an important part of the discussions around this phenomenon, they are by no means the sole reason. More interestingly the mobility of the homes themselves are part of the driving force in popularity, allowing occupants to more freely move around to see or do things they wish to partake in. This gives dwellers a better sense of control and autonomy over their own lives. Thus, mobile home dwellers should be seen less as impoverished squalors and more as a complex group of people whose motivations are far more intricate. Mobile homes are less a desperate housing solution for people on the verge of homelessness and more akin to a means to gain a personal sense of freedom beyond overcoming mere economic constraints.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.234

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0250.003
Scholarly communication0.0060.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueuO Research (University of Ottawa)→Same topicCanadian Identity and History→French-language works237,207→