A literatura dos povos indígenas canadenses e a construção do conhecimento através da lenda e da tradição oral
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A tradicao oral pode ser considerada como a base da transmissao do conhecimento de uma geracao para a outra dentro das comunidades indigenas. Foi atraves das narrativas orais que os povos nativos mantiveram seus lacos coesos e suas estorias em constante movimento. O objetivo da oratoria indigena era transmitir as lendas, os mitos e as cancoes das comunidades, fazendo com que os aspectos culturais e identitarios dos grupos fossem compartilhados e preservados ao longo do tempo. Contudo, as narrativas orais nao eram moldadas para serem lidas, mas antes compartilhadas por meio de performances de contacao de estorias. Ou seja, a literatura das sociedades amerindias era uma literatura de carater oral, idealizada e difundida pelos mecanismos da tradicao oral. Assim sendo, o objetivo deste artigo e o de analisar duas lendas literarias: “The recluse” (“O solitario”) e “The lost salmon-run” (“A ultima pesca do salmao”) ambas presentes na obra Legends of Vancouver (1911), de Emily Pauline Johnson, levando em consideracao o modo como a autora por meio do texto literario em um formato escrito resgatou o genero folclorico lenda e a tradicao oral para construir lendas literarias que espelham a performance oral.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.016 | 0.029 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.018 | 0.010 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.009 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".