MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3047477991 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.pedca19-a63

Abstract A63: Overcoming challenges in health care with machine learning: Innovation from retinoblastoma

2020· article· en· W3047477991 on OpenAlexaffabout
Isabella Janusonis, Tran Truong, Justin Liu, Mei Chen, Brenda L. Gallie

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRetinopathy of Prematurity Studies
Canadian institutionsEsri (Canada)Hospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRetinoblastomaTimelineMedicineHealth careElectronic health recordMedical physicsDiseaseFamily medicineArtificial intelligenceComputer sciencePathologyStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: As retinoblastoma is a rare pediatric cancer (1/17,000 live births) with little evidence to justify treatment choices, we built a cloud-based retinoblastoma-specific electronic health record database for point-of-care data to support clinical and research collaboration and provide a quantitative analysis of prescribed treatments. Methods: Disease-specific Electronic Patient Illustrated Clinical Timeline (DEPICT HEALTH) is online, cloud-based, interactive, with point-of-care timelines and corresponding retinal/tumor drawings, with standardized scoring of tumor number, size, and locations. Results: DEPICT HEALTH records are contributed by the entire care team and used in quantitative treatment analyses. DEPICT HEALTH effectively communicates disease and treatment information to the patients’ circle of care and their parents, independent of language. The Retinoblastoma Activity Index (RAI) quantifies the active tumor (colored yellow) by counting the yellow pixels in the DEPICT HEALTH digital drawings. The drawings represent tumor at every encounter based on the collective opinion of the care team, and the RAI will quantitate tumor response to treatment. Two clinical trials were initiated using DEPICT HEALTH and RAI for eligibility and short- and long-term outcomes. Conclusion: Using RAI to score tumor response provides RECIST (response evaluation criteria in solid tumors) for retinoblastoma research, a standard of measurement that has never before been available. Machine learning methods will ultimately analyze point-of-care data to predict patient outcomes and assist with clinical decision making. DEPICT HEALTH provides an unbiased view of the efficacy of treatments, with potential to allow global point-of-care data to be widely available for research, essentially an “n” of “ALL.” Citation Format: Isabella Janusonis, Tran Truong, Justin Liu, Mei Chen, Brenda Gallie. Overcoming challenges in health care with machine learning: Innovation from retinoblastoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on the Advances in Pediatric Cancer Research; 2019 Sep 17-20; Montreal, QC, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(14 Suppl):Abstract nr A63.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.354
Threshold uncertainty score0.607

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.188
GPT teacher head0.420
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicRetinopathy of Prematurity StudiesFrench-language works237,207