Good clinical results using a modified kinematic alignment technique with a cruciate sacrificing medially stabilised total knee arthroplasty
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study aims to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of a modified technique of Kinematically Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty (KA TKA) using a cruciate sacrificing (CS) medially stabilised prosthesis at a minimum 24-months follow-up. METHODS: 59 patients with a varus HKA angle who underwent a TKA from May, 2016 to April, 2017 were retrospectively enrolled. Radiological and clinical evaluations were assessed after 40 days, 6 months and at a minimum follow-up of 24 months. Long leg standing X-rays were performed pre-operatively and the Hip-Knee-Ankle (HKA) angle, the mechanical Lateral Distal Femoral Angle (mLDFA), the mechanical Medial Proximal Tibial Angle (mMPTA) and the Knee Joint Line Obliquity Angle (KJLOA) were analysed. At a minimum follow-up of 24 months, the patients were evaluated subjectively based on the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index Score (WOMAC) and the Oxford Knee Score (OKS). The post-operative range of motion (ROM) was measured. To reduce flexion instability, an original technique was used, with more posterior positioning of the femoral component, called the "virtuous mistake". Results were compared to the data reported in the literature in patients treated with standard kinematic alignment (KA) technique. RESULTS: No difference was found between the mean pre-operative and post-operative angles regarding mLDFA (p value = 0.410) and mMTPA (p value = 0.242). A difference of 0.8° in HKA angle between males and females was found, with more varus results in males. At a minimum follow-up of 24 months, the WOMAC was 87 (SD 4.3), the OKS was 41 (SD 2.4), and the flexion was 124°, which was similar to the data reported in literature with standard KA. There were not any cases of aseptic failures. CONCLUSIONS: The modified KA TKA surgical technique proposed in this study can achieve good clinical results at minimum 24 months of follow-up, reproducing accurately native mLDFA and mMPTA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".