Educação infantil: espaço do brincar e da interação da criança
Bibliographic record
Abstract
O presente artigo objetiva problematizar a condição subjetiva da criança enquanto sujeito num contexto fortemente influenciado pelos pressupostos neoliberais. Desse modo, o estudo qualitativo e de abordagem exploratório-interpretativa buscou refletir sobre a necessária construção conceptual da criança como sujeito histórico e de interação, no sentido de superar as influências paradigmáticas neoliberais da Educação Infantil. Desse modo, a metodologia de estudo englobou a pesquisa bibliográfica, alicerçada em autores como: Ariès (1981); Sarmento (2005); Dewey (1979); Teixeira (1934); Dardot e Laval (2016); Larrosa (2015). A pesquisa constituiu-se da contraposição do paradigma neoliberal de infância pela concepção da subjetivação infantil, tendo em vista as interações, as experiências e o brincar. Por fim, as reflexões chamam atenção para o fato de os espaços educacionais romperem com a dogmatização pedagógica neoliberal, de modo a firmar-se na concepção da criança com direitos de aprendizagem por meio do brincar.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.009 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".