MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3047582545 · doi:10.5817/cejcs2019-14-5

Korean diasporic perceptions of Canada in the light of the CBC TV series Kim's Convenience

2019· article· en· W3047582545 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Judit Nagy, Mátyás Bánhegyi

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Central European journal of Canadian studies · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAsian Culture and Media Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSeries (stratigraphy)Television seriesAdvertisingBusinessMedia studiesSociologyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Based on the Korean-Canadian playwright Ins Choi's play Kim's Convenience, the TV series of the same name (which started airing on CBC in the fall of 2016 and is now in its third season) centers around the Kim family, who immigrated from Korea in the 1980s and run a convenience store in present-day Toronto. The series abounds in references to the Kim family's observations of their environment, and their typical first- and second-generation Korean Canadian responses to it. However, while the play tends to gravitate towards diasporic issues, the series can be seen as a transnational variation of the play presented through the Korean diasporic lens. Accordingly, the article will analyze the episodes of the first season of the TV series with two aims in mind. Firstly, it will attempt to shed light on the differences between the first- and the second-generation Korean immigrants' perception of Canada. Secondly, it will estimate how the Kim family's interaction with their environment is representative of a new transnational culture.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.048
Threshold uncertainty score0.194

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0140.006
Scholarly communication0.0060.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Central European journal of Canadian studiesSame topicAsian Culture and Media StudiesFrench-language works237,207