Reduction of the Line-of-Sight Equivalence Principle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An improvement to the line-of-sight (LoS) approximation of the equivalence principle used in far-field computations is presented. In the original LoS approximation of the equivalence principle, the integral equation uses only the surface currents on the LoS surface, as well as the edge currents on the contour of the LoS surface, which is the replacement of the surface integrals over the shadow part of the surface. Here, we show that the integration over one type of surface current on the LoS surface and edge currents is sufficient, which reduces the resources required for the LoS radiation pattern computations by half. The proposed theory is a rigorous analysis of Love’s Equivalence theory with an introduction of the point-of-symmetry concept. The proposed method makes use of the vector-potential field representation to derive the improved LoS equivalence principle. The proposed approach is validated with the calculation of the far-field radiation pattern of a patch antenna using the Finite Difference Time Domain (FDTD) simulations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".