To Study the Effect of LiMn2O4, Nanofibers of LiMn2O4, and Graphene/Polyaniline/Carbon Nanotube as Electrode Materials in the Fuel Cell
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study is conducted to explore the best electrodes materials for energy conversion devices. The two cathode materials (LiMn2O4 and nanofibers of LiMn2O4) and the anode material (graphene/polyaniline/carbon-nanotube) were synthesized by a wet chemical method which includes sol-gel and chemical polymerization techniques. The prepared materials were characterized by SEM, XRD FTIR, and cyclic voltammetry. The characterization results show that LiMn2O4 exhibits a porous and hollow structure, which improves the utilization of the active mass area, and allows the dual conduction of Li+ and electrons, which effectively relieves the structural strain and volume change. The cyclic voltammetry results record that LiMn2O4 and nanofibers of LiMn2O4 as a cathode material enhanced the cycling performance and possess excellent stability. Further, the conductivity of each sample was measured using the DC four-probe method, and the highest conductivity was observed for the LiMn2O4 nanofibers 1.43 SCm -1 at 650.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".