Predicting Traffic-Related Air Pollution Using Feature Extraction from Built Environment Images
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study develops a set of algorithms to extract built environment features from Google aerial and street view images, reflecting the microcharacteristics of an urban location as well as the different functions of buildings. These features were used to train a Bayesian regularized artificial neural network (BRANN) model to predict near-road air quality based on measurements of ultrafine particles (UFPs) and black carbon (BC) in Toronto, Canada. The resulting models [adjusted R2 of 75.87 and 79.10% for UFP and BC and root mean squared error (RMSE) of 21,800 part/cm3 and 1300 ng/m3 for UFP and BC] were compared with similar ANN models developed using the same predictors, but extracted from traditional geographic information system (GIS) databases [adjusted R2 of 58.74 and 64.21% for UFP and BC and RMSE values of 23,000 part/cm3 and 1600 ng/m3 for UFP and BC]. The models based on feature extraction exhibited higher predictive power, thus highlighting the greater accuracy of the proposed methods compared to GIS layers that are solely based on aerial images. A comparison with other neural network approaches as well as with a traditional land-use regression model demonstrates the strength of the BRANN model for spatial interpolation of air quality.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it