Predicting Traffic-Related Air Pollution Using Feature Extraction from Built Environment Images
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study develops a set of algorithms to extract built environment features from Google aerial and street view images, reflecting the microcharacteristics of an urban location as well as the different functions of buildings. These features were used to train a Bayesian regularized artificial neural network (BRANN) model to predict near-road air quality based on measurements of ultrafine particles (UFPs) and black carbon (BC) in Toronto, Canada. The resulting models [adjusted R 2 of 75.87 and 79.10% for UFP and BC and root mean squared error (RMSE) of 21,800 part/cm 3 and 1300 ng/m 3 for UFP and BC] were compared with similar ANN models developed using the same predictors, but extracted from traditional geographic information system (GIS) databases [adjusted R 2 of 58.74 and 64.21% for UFP and BC and RMSE values of 23,000 part/cm 3 and 1600 ng/m 3 for UFP and BC]. The models based on feature extraction exhibited higher predictive power, thus highlighting the greater accuracy of the proposed methods compared to GIS layers that are solely based on aerial images. A comparison with other neural network approaches as well as with a traditional land-use regression model demonstrates the strength of the BRANN model for spatial interpolation of air quality.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".