MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3047736929 · doi:10.3390/math8081334

Coefficient Estimates for a Subclass of Analytic Functions Associated with a Certain Leaf-Like Domain

2020· article· en· W3047736929 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematics · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAnalytic and geometric function theory
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubordination (linguistics)Analytic functionSubclassUnit diskMathematicsGeneralizationClass (philosophy)Domain (mathematical analysis)Quasi-analytic functionPure mathematicsFunction (biology)Order (exchange)Complex-valued functionMathematical analysisNon-analytic smooth functionCalculus (dental)Global analytic functionComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

First, by making use of the concept of basic (or q-) calculus, as well as the principle of subordination between analytic functions, generalization Rq(h) of the class R(h) of analytic functions, which are associated with the leaf-like domain in the open unit disk U, is given. Then, the coefficient estimates, the Fekete–Szegö problem, and the second-order Hankel determinant H2(1) for functions belonging to this class Rq(h) are investigated. Furthermore, similar results are examined and presented for the functions zf(z) and f−1(z). For the validity of our results, relevant connections with those in earlier works are also pointed out.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.840
Threshold uncertainty score0.786

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it