Extreme Value Metaheuristics and Coupled Mapped Lattice Approaches for Gas Turbine-Absorption Chiller Optimization
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The increasing complexity of engineering systems has spurred the development of highly efficient optimization techniques. This chapter focuses on two novel optimization methodologies: extreme value stochastic engines (random number generators) and the coupled map lattice (CML). This chapter proposes the incorporation of extreme value distributions into stochastic engines of conventional metaheuristics and the implementation of CMLs to improve the overall optimization. The central idea is to propose approaches for dealing with highly complex, large-scale multi-objective (MO) problems. In this work the differential evolution (DE) approach was employed (incorporated with the extreme value stochastic engine) while the CML was employed independently (as an analogue to evolutionary algorithms). The techniques were then applied to optimize a real-world MO Gas Turbine-Absorption Chiller system. Comparative analyses among the conventional DE approach (Gauss-DE), extreme value DE strategies, and the CML were carried out.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it