Implementation Of Birth Certificate Issuance Service Improvement Program (A Study of Permendagri No. 9 of 2016 in the Population and Civil Registration Office)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aims to analyze the implementation of a program to improve birth certificate issuance services at the Population and Civil Registration Office in Madiun Regency as a mandate from Permendagri No. 9 of 2016 concerning the Acceleration of Increasing the Coverage of Birth Certificate Ownership and to know the supporting and inhibiting factors. The author uses the indicator component of PermenPAN-RB No. 38 of 2012 concerning guidelines for evaluating public service performance. The results showed that one out of three excellent programs have not yet been felt beneficial. Based on analysis of PermenPAN-RB Regulation No.38 of 2012, there are six of nine indicators in the study results that were not run optimally. Supporting factors include budget, government support, and collaboration with village officials. The inhibiting factors are geographical location, human resources, communication/coordination, community awareness, semi-online services, data management, and population event reports at the village level
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it