MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3047845123 · doi:10.1134/s1063778820020027

Application of Asymptotic Methods to Calculating Electroweak Corrections in Polarized Bhabha Scattering

2020· article· en· W3047845123 on OpenAlexaff
A. Aleksejevs, S. Barkanova, Yu. M. Bystritskiy, V. Zykunov

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics of Atomic Nuclei · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsElectroweak interactionBhabha scatteringRenormalizationRadiative transferParticle physicsObservableAsymmetryPolarization (electrochemistry)ScatteringElectron–positron annihilationQuantum electrodynamicsNuclear physicsQuantum mechanicsHadron

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Asymptotic expressions for one-loop electroweak radiative corrections to observables of polarized Bhabha scattering are obtained within the on-shell renormalization scheme. The results of a numerical analysis of relative one-loop electroweak corrections to the cross section and polarization asymmetry are reproduced at energies below and above the $$Z$$ resonance. A successful comparison with exact results obtained by means of computer-algebra systems is performed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.267
Threshold uncertainty score0.489

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysics of Atomic NucleiSame topicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studiesFrench-language works237,207