MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3047873421 · doi:10.5006/c2020-15186

Monitoring Performance of Low-ppm Corrosion Inhibitor in Long Cross-country Pipeline Carrying Very Light Hydrocarbons

2020· article· en· W3047873421 on OpenAlexaff
Hitesh G. Bagaria, Jennifer Sargent, Noah Weiss, David M. Wolfe, Moshood Adewale, Trevor Place

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCorrosion Behavior and Inhibition
Canadian institutionsSuez (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPipeline (software)CorrosionCorrosion inhibitorEnvironmental scienceMaterials sciencePipeline transportPetroleum engineeringWaste managementMetallurgyEnvironmental engineeringEngineeringMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Bitumen diluents with very low basic sediment and water (<0.5%) are transported in Enbridge’s (the Company) pipelines. The dissolved water and oxygen in diluents have the potential to cause corrosion in the pipeline. In addition, low density and viscosity of the diluent facilitate solid settling, raising the risk of under deposit corrosion. These potential corrosion risks are mitigated by continuous application of a corrosion inhibitor and regular pipeline pigging to remove the solids. Previously, a modified NACE TM-0172 method was developed to identify a suitable corrosion inhibitor (NACE-2019-13028). A highly sensitive analytical method to measure the sub-ppm inhibitor residual was also developed as a key performance monitoring tool (NACE-2019-13112). In this study, we report the results from an ongoing continuous pipeline inhibitor program. Specifically, inhibitor residual was measured in diluent as well as solids collected at various locations from the cross-country pipeline. The corrosivity of the diluent was assessed by NACE TM-0172.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCorrosion Behavior and InhibitionFrench-language works237,207