MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3047920263 · doi:10.1016/s2542-5196(20)30173-x

Climate change and COVID-19: reinforcing Indigenous food systems

2020· article· en· W3047920263 on OpenAlexafffund
Carol Zavaleta-Cortijo, James D. Ford, Ingrid Arotoma‐Rojas, Shuaib Lwasa, Guillermo Lancha-Rucoba, Patricia García, J. Jaime Miranda, Didacus B. Namanya, Mark New, Carlee J. Wright, Lea Berrang‐Ford, César Cárcamo, Victoria L. Edge, Sherilee L. Harper

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Lancet Planetary Health · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicFood Security and Health in Diverse Populations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNational Cancer InstituteMedical Research CouncilUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillAlliance for Health Policy and Systems ResearchWorld Diabetes FoundationInter-American Institute for Global Change ResearchFondo Nacional de Ciencia Tecnología e InnovaciónCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Science FoundationGrand Challenges CanadaFogarty International CenterNational Institute of Mental HealthNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteFondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico, Tecnológico y de Innovación TecnológicaDepartment for International DevelopmentNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchBritish CouncilDepartment of Health and Social CareJames Dyson FoundationSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungInternational Development Research CentreBloomberg PhilanthropiesWellcome Trust
KeywordsIndigenousClimate changeScopusPsychological resilienceGeographyPopulationPandemicFood systemsDevelopment economicsSocioeconomicsPolitical scienceFood securityEconomic growthEnvironmental healthCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)SociologyEcologyMedicineAgriculturePsychologyMEDLINEInfectious disease (medical specialty)DiseaseEconomicsBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Comment in The Lancet Planetary Health (August 7 2020).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.723
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.466
GPT teacher head0.450
Teacher spread0.016 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations65
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Lancet Planetary HealthSame topicFood Security and Health in Diverse PopulationsFrench-language works237,207