Medical Microbiology on the Pages of “Scientific Notes of Kazan University” (Chronicle of 1879)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The journal “Scientific notes of Kazan University” (the name was changing slightly at different times) has more than two centuries of history and has always been published as an interdisciplinary publication. The content of the journal included reports on the Humanities and Natural Sciences. The works of Kazan physicians published there have always enjoyed special interest due to their great practical significance: the issues of combating various infectious diseases (cholera, plague, tuberculosis, measles, and others) were often covered on the pages of “Scientific notes”. In this respect 1879 turned out to be special — the problems of infectious diseases, their prevention and legal regulation of anti-epidemic measures were presented by scientists of Kazan University. The article analyzes the works of Florinsky, Vysotsky, Shpilevsky, Shestakov, Skvortsov, Dogel, Pashutin, Shcherbakov, Potekhin, Lyubimov, Studensky, Zaitsev and Stepanov, who published their works in “Scientific notes” in 1879, and assesses their contribution to the development of natural science in Russia in the last quarter of the XIX century.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.121 | 0.046 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".