Experimental Validation of a Robust H∞ Control Method on Miniaturized Optical Image Stabilizer Prototypes
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This paper validates a robust H∞ controller design method, experimentally, on miniaturized prototypes of the magnetically actuated lens-tilting optical image stabilizers (OISs) with product variabilities. Five small-scale OIS prototypes with product variations are constructed by three-dimensional (3D) printing. For the prototypes, the model parameters are identified based on experimental frequency response data of the prototypes. Using the identified model, a robust H∞ controller is designed to guarantee the robust stability of the closed-loop system and to optimize the closed-loop performance. The experimental results reveal larger and more complex uncertainties in miniaturized OISs with mass-produced parts compared to large-scale prototypes. Despite the increased amount of uncertainties, it is demonstrated that the robust H∞ controller still outperforms the conventional controllers in terms of robust closed-loop stability, performance, and controller order for practical implementation on a mobile phone device.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it