MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3048071603 · doi:10.1080/15421406.2020.1743941

Electrically tunable liquid crystal lens in extreme temperature conditions

2020· article· en· W3048071603 on OpenAlexaffabout
Anastasiia Pusenkova, Tigran Galstian

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Crystals and Liquid Crystals · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicLiquid Crystal Research Advancements
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLens (geology)Liquid crystalMaterials scienceOpticsCrystal (programming language)OptoelectronicsPhysicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We investigate the potential of using electrically tunable liquid crystal lenses (TLCLs) to record the activity of small animals in the Canadian Arctic. This suggests extreme temperature conditions that may dramatically change the TLCL’s parameters. Our analysis is performed on the example of “modal-control” TLCLs. Temperature dependences of main parameters are presented for TLCLs made with 5CB and ultra-low viscosity LCs. We finally propose an approach allowing to “athermalize” such lenses by adjusting certain control parameters, to maintain good optical performance. Other factors and limitations that affect the lens performance with temperature change are also discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular Crystals and Liquid CrystalsSame topicLiquid Crystal Research AdvancementsFrench-language works237,207