MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3048080661 · doi:10.1109/mdm48529.2020.00057

A Big Data Platform For Spatio-Temporal Social Event Discovery

2020· article· en· W3048080661 on OpenAlexaff
Aamir Khan, Imad Afyouni, Zaher Al Aghbari

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicComplex Network Analysis Techniques
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceSocial mediaBig dataEvent (particle physics)MicrobloggingScalabilityData scienceData stream miningArchitectureInformation extractionStreaming dataNatural disasterData miningWorld Wide WebInformation retrievalDatabaseGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The tremendous rise of location-enriched microblogging has made it possible to discover social events from social media, as well as their evolution over space and time. Over the last decade, multiple studies on event detection from social media have been proposed, with the aim of extracting specific types of events, such as, social gatherings, natural disasters, and emergency situations, among others. However, existing works do not consider the incremental and continuous processing of events over the large amounts of social streams, and therefore, cannot determine the spatial and temporal evolution of such events. This work presents a big data mining platform for the incremental discovery of geo-social events based on a scalable and efficient architecture that can manage and mine a huge data flow of unstructured streams. We demonstrate our early results over twitter datasets and discuss its main advantage by incorporating advanced features for event extraction, thus allowing for great opportunities from application perspectives.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.968
Threshold uncertainty score0.363

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.107
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicComplex Network Analysis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207