Axiological Ideas of Moral and Spiritual development in V. V. Zenkovsky’s PHILOSOPHICAL and Pedagogical Heritage
Bibliographic record
Abstract
В статье представлены аксиологические идеи духовно-нравственного воспитания личности в философско-педагогическом наследии В. В. Зеньковского. Созданная ученым христианская антропология, в основе которой лежит иерархически-гармоничное развитие и совершенствование человеческой личности, способствовала решению важной педагогической проблемы — духовно-нравственного воспитания человека на основе христианских, общечеловеческих и культурных ценностей. С этих позиций представлен анализ аксиологического ядра личности, состоящего из таких категорий, как истина, добро, красота и святыня, их соотношение с различными формами духовно-эмпирической конституции человека. The article presents axiological ideas of moral and spiritual development of a person in V. V. Zenkovsky’s philosophical and pedagogical heritage. Christian anthropology created by the scholar and based on a hierarchical harmony and improvement promoted the solution of an important pedagogical issue, namely moral and spiritual development of a person on the basis of Christian, universal human and cultural values. The article analyzes the axiological core of a personality which encompasses such categories as truth, kindness, and sanctity; it also analyzes their relation to various facets of human spirituality.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.016 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".