Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
VenuePhysics Letters B · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersH2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie ActionsRutherford Appleton LaboratoryInstituto Nazionale di Fisica NucleareAgencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y TecnológicaFundação para a Ciência e a TecnologiaAustralian Research CouncilNational Research Council CanadaHorizon 2020 Framework ProgrammeAgencia Nacional de Investigación y DesarrolloJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceNational Research Center "Kurchatov Institute"Services Fédéraux des Affaires Scientifiques, Techniques et CulturellesBrookhaven National LaboratoryEuropean Regional Development FundBritish Columbia Knowledge Development FundEuropean Research CouncilMax-Planck-GesellschaftCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueInstitut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des ParticulesMinistry of Science and Technology, TaiwanMinisterstwo Edukacji i NaukiCanada Foundation for InnovationNarodowe Centrum NaukiConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoBundesministerium für Wissenschaft, Forschung und WirtschaftAustrian Science FundScience and Technology Facilities CouncilSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungMinisterstvo Průmyslu a ObchoduDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekChinese Academy of SciencesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and TechnologyBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungEuropean CommissionLeverhulme TrustFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São PauloEuropean Social FundRoyal SocietyCentre National pour la Recherche Scientifique et TechniqueDepartamento Administrativo de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación (COLCIENCIAS)German-Israeli Foundation for Scientific Research and DevelopmentJavna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RSMinistry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of ChinaAgence Nationale de la RechercheEuropean Cooperation in Science and TechnologyGeneralitat ValencianaGeneralitat de CatalunyaDepartment of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, IndiaGeneral Secretariat for Research and TechnologyIsrael Science FoundationComisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y TecnológicaTürkiye Atom Enerjisi KurumuJoint Institute for Nuclear ResearchArizona-Nevada Academy of ScienceNational Science FoundationCompute CanadaInstitut de Valorisation des DonnéesAlexander von Humboldt-StiftungTRIUMFHelmholtz-GemeinschaftCanarieCentres de Recerca de CatalunyaCERNDanmarks GrundforskningsfondMinisterio de Ciencia e InnovaciónNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsPhysicsHiggs bosonParticle physicsBranching fractionLarge Hadron ColliderStandard Model (mathematical formulation)Nuclear physicsBosonHadronAtlas (anatomy)Atlas detectorLuminositySigmaQuantum mechanics
Abstract
fetched live from OpenAlexA search for the dimuon decay of the Standard Model (SM) Higgs boson is performed using data corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 139 fb − 1 collected with the ATLAS detector in Run 2 pp collisions at s = 13 TeV at the Large Hadron Collider. The observed (expected) significance over the background-only hypothesis for a Higgs boson with a mass of 125.09 GeV is 2.0 σ (1.7 σ ). The observed upper limit on the cross section times branching ratio for p p → H → μ μ is 2.2 times the SM prediction at 95% confidence level, while the expected limit on a H → μ μ signal assuming the absence (presence) of a SM signal is 1.1 (2.0). The best-fit value of the signal strength parameter, defined as the ratio of the observed signal yield to the one expected in the SM, is μ = 1.2 ± 0.6 .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.327
Threshold uncertainty score0.268
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it
