MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3048183251 · doi:10.1088/1873-7005/abad8a

On the hydrodynamic stability of an imploding rotating circular cylindrical liquid liner

2020· article· en· W3048183251 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueFluid Dynamics Research · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer
Canadian institutionsGeneral Fusion (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWKB approximationMechanicsPhysicsPerturbation (astronomy)Hydrostatic equilibriumRotation (mathematics)BuckleLinear stabilityClassical mechanicsMaterials scienceInstabilityMathematicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The hydrodynamic stability of an imploding cylindrical liquid liner is analytically and numerically investigated. Such dynamic system can be used to compress gas trapped by the liner, as one may seek in a hydrogen fusion reactor. For such system it is vital for the liner to stay intact at least up to the turnaround point, which marks the point of maximum compression of the inner gas. New two-dimensional linear stability of Bell-type equation and Wentzel-Kramers-Brillouin (WKB) approximations are derived to account for the rotation of the liner. Excellent agreement is achieved between computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and 1D analysis for the trajectory of the unperturbed liner. Very good agreement is also achieved between the Bell type linear stability solution and the CFD until non-linear effects take hold near the turnaround point. The WKB approximation also agrees well but only at the early stage of the liner motion. Viscosity, surface tension and inner gas stability waves are found to have a small effect for a liner’s radial compression of up to ten. It is seen that the rotation has little effect on the perturbation amplitude during the accelerating stage of the liner, which is dominated by a slow oscillatory growth of a Bell-Plesset type at the studied conditions. However, at the decelerating stage towards the turnaround point, Rayleigh–Taylor rapid perturbation growth is suppressed at sufficiently large rotation rates. Hence, when coupled with non-linear saturation effects, the liner stays much intact until the turnaround point for radial compression ratios of up to ten. New simple linear stability limits are derived and are analysed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.645
Threshold uncertainty score0.862

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it