MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3048214410 · doi:10.1016/j.akcej.2019.12.016

The <i>k</i>-conversion number of regular graphs

2020· article· en· W3048214410 on OpenAlexafffund
Christina M. Mynhardt, Jane Wodlinger

Bibliographic record

VenueAKCE International Journal of Graphs and Combinatorics · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Graph Theory Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCombinatoricsMathematicsMaximal independent setVertex (graph theory)Dominating setUpper and lower boundsSet (abstract data type)Discrete mathematicsGraphChordal graph1-planar graphComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Given a graph and a set an irreversible k -threshold conversion process on G is an iterative process wherein, for each St is obtained from by adjoining all vertices that have at least k neighbors in We call the set S0 the seed set of the process, and refer to S0 as an irreversible k-threshold conversion set, or a k-conversion set, of G if for some The k-conversion number is the size of a minimum k-conversion set of G. A set is a decycling set, or feedback vertex set, if and only if is acyclic. It is known that k-conversion sets in -regular graphs coincide with decycling sets. We characterize k-regular graphs having a k-conversion set of size k, discuss properties of -regular graphs having a k-conversion set of size k, and obtain a lower bound for for -regular graphs. We present classes of cubic graphs that attain the bound for and others that exceed it—for example, we construct classes of 3-connected cubic graphs Hm of arbitrary girth that exceed the lower bound for by at least m.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.071
Threshold uncertainty score0.285

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAKCE International Journal of Graphs and CombinatoricsSame topicAdvanced Graph Theory ResearchFrench-language works237,207