Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, a novel time-frequency (TF) analysis method, referred to as the scaling-basis chirplet transform (SBCT), is developed by extending the conventional chirplet transform. This method includes a replacement kernel function that can vary the chirp rate with frequency and time by scaling the TF basis at and around the corresponding time center. This enables the corresponding chirplets to accurately match the targeted slopes for every trajectory of a multicomponent signal and within any window length. Therefore, the TF representation obtained via the SBCT can achieve significantly higher energy concentrations even for multicomponent signals with close-spaced frequencies and high levels of background noise. The effectiveness of the proposed SBCT approach was demonstrated by analyzing a numerical multicomponent signal and a vibration signal obtained from a gearbox test rig. Both numerical and experimental results showed that the SBCT can satisfactorily handle multicomponent signals with nonlinear frequency trajectories, close-spaced frequencies, and noisy backgrounds, demonstrating its superiority.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it