MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Particle Swarm Optimization – Model Predictive Control for Microgrid Energy Management

2020· article· en· W3048350209 on OpenAlexaff
Van Quyen Ngo, Kamal Al‐Haddad, Kim Khoa Nguyen

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrogrid Control and Optimization
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrogridParticle swarm optimizationRenewable energyComputer scienceModel predictive controlGridMathematical optimizationEnergy managementDistributed generationMulti-swarm optimizationSmart gridReliability (semiconductor)Energy (signal processing)Control (management)EngineeringPower (physics)AlgorithmMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Microgrid is becoming the most attractive solution for integrating distributed renewable sources into the utility grid. Such a system combines renewable generations with conventional distributed generations, storage systems, and loads in one entity operating in both isolated and grid-connected modes. However, it also associates with a high level of uncertainty and volatility following climatic conditions. Therefore, energy management strategies in operating MGs plays a crucial role in term of economic and reliability. This paper investigates a method applying constrained multi-swarm particle swarm optimization without velocity-based model predictive control to optimize the operation cost in small scale PV-MGs. The results are compared with the linear programming algorithm. The results show the effective modified particle swarm optimization embedded in the model predictive control algorithm performed well. The simulations are run over 24 hours ahead based on the forecast data of PV generation, load demands, and energy price.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.909
Threshold uncertainty score0.473

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.168
Teacher spread0.162 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMicrogrid Control and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207