Nitric oxide is fundamental to neurovascular coupling in humans
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Key points Preclinical models have demonstrated that nitric oxide is a key component of neurovascular coupling; this has yet to be translated to humans. We conducted two separate protocols utilizing intravenous infusion of a nitric oxide synthase inhibitor and isovolumic haemodilution to assess the influence of nitric oxide on neurovascular coupling in humans. Isovolumic haemodilution did not alter neurovascular coupling. Intravenous infusion of a nitric oxide synthase inhibitor reduced the neurovascular coupling response by ∼30%, indicating that nitric oxide is integral to neurovascular coupling in humans. Abstract Nitric oxide is a vital neurovascular signalling molecule in preclinical models, yet the mechanisms underlying neurovascular coupling (NVC) in humans have yet to be elucidated. To investigate the contribution of nitric oxide to NVC in humans, we utilized a visual stimulus paradigm to elicit an NVC response in the posterior cerebral circulation. Two distinct mechanistic interventions were conducted on young healthy males: (1) NVC was assessed during intravenous infusion of saline (placebo) and the non‐selective competitive nitric oxide synthase inhibitor N G ‐monomethyl‐ l ‐arginine ( l ‐NMMA, 5 mg kg −1 bolus & subsequent 50 μg kg −1 min −1 maintenance dose; n = 10). The order of infusion was randomized, counterbalanced and single blinded. A subset of participants in this study ( n = 4) underwent a separate intervention with phenylephrine infusion to independently consider the influence of blood pressure changes on NVC (0.1–0.6 μg kg −1 min −1 constant infusion). (2) NVC was assessed prior to and following isovolumic haemodilution, whereby 20% of whole blood was removed and replaced with 5% human serum albumin to reduce haemoglobin concentration ( n = 8). For both protocols, arterial and internal jugular venous blood samples were collected at rest and coupled with volumetric measures of cerebral blood flow (duplex ultrasound) to quantify resting cerebral metabolic parameters. l ‐NMMA elicited a 30% reduction in the peak ( P = 0.01), but not average ( P = 0.11), NVC response. Neither phenylephrine nor haemodilution influenced NVC. Nitric oxide signalling is integral to NVC in humans, providing a new direction for research into pharmacological treatment of humans with dementia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".