MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3048433152 · doi:10.71892/11143/199

Pédagogie en plein air dans l’enseignement supérieur en contexte de COVID-19 au Canada : guide pédagogique pour appuyer les personnes enseignantes

2020· article· fr· W3048433152 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jean‐Philippe Ayotte‐Beaudet, Marie‐Claude Beaudry, Véronique Bisaillon, Marianne Dubé

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicUrban Green Space and Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)MedicineDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le présent guide a pour objectif de soutenir les réflexions pédagogiques des personnes enseignantes qui souhaitent utiliser des milieux extérieurs dans un contexte de pédagogie universitaire. Il présente les avantages et certains mythes associés à la pédagogie en plein air ainsi que des approches pédagogiques auxquelles on peut recourir. Il propose des questionnements afin d’orienter le choix de la classe et la planification pédagogique. Finalement, quelques personnes de différents horizons livrent un court témoignage de leur expérience.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.167
Threshold uncertainty score0.335

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0200.016
Scholarly communication0.0090.004
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MIND→Same topicUrban Green Space and Health→French-language works237,207→