Design of paste tailings disposal in the Russian Sub-Arctic
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Julietta Gold Project is a proposed gold mine in the Magadan Province of eastern Russia. The project, a joint venture of Russian and Canadian interests, proposes to use paste for the surface tailings disposal system for the mine. The paste would be deposited on surface when it is not being used as backfill for the underground operation. Approximately 45% of the tailings would be used underground as paste backfill while the remainder would be disposed of on surface at a slurry density of approximately 75%. The use of the paste underground and on surface reduces the disposal area by over 75% compared to a conventional disposal facility and reduces the environmental impact at the site as the low moisture content of the tailings will allow them to freeze as placement proceeds. The economics of the underground operation are improved with the use of paste backfill and the economics on surface are improved with the smaller disposal area. This paper discusses the feasibility study for the surface disposal of the tailings.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it