Comparison of the Functionality of Exopolysaccharides Produced by Sourdough Lactic Acid Bacteria in Bread and Steamed Bread
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Exopolysaccharides (EPSs) produced by lactic acid bacteria improve the quality of bread; however, their functionality in steamed bread is unknown. This study aimed to compare the impact of EPS produced during sourdough fermentation on the quality of bread and steamed bread. Sourdoughs were fermented with EPS-producing Fructilactobacillus sanfranciscensis, Weissella cibaria, and Leuconostoc mesenteroides; Latilactobacillus sakei LS8 and chemically acidified sourdough were prepared as controls. EPS production generally enhanced the specific volume, improved the texture, and reduced the staling rate of bread. The effect of EPS on steamed bread quality was more pronounced when compared to its effect on bread quality. Remarkably, the beneficial effects of F. sanfranciscensis bread quality were largely independent of EPS formation and may relate to gluten modifications rather than EPS production. In conclusion, the direct comparison of sourdough and EPS functionality in steaming and baking provides novel insights for the optimization of commercial (steamed) bread production.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".