MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3048461838

PREVALÊNCIA DE CASOS DE INTOLERÂNCIA À LACTOSE DIAGNOSTICADOS EM UM LABORATÓRIO DO SUL DE SANTA CATARINA NO PERÍODO DE 2015 A 2019

2020· article· pt· W3048461838 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Priscila Moreira Lohmann

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDigestive system and related health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLactose intoleranceLactoseLactaseMedicinePhysiologyGynecologyDemographyFood scienceBiology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lactose intolerance is the absence or deficiency of the enzyme lactase, an enzyme responsible for hydrolyzing lactose in glucose and galactose, monosaccharides absorbable by the intestinal mucosa. People with lactose intolerance may have a direct influence on their nutritional status. Thus, this work has as its main objective to study the prevalence of cases of lactose intolerance in a laboratory in Tubarao - SC, in the years 2015 to 2019. The survey of the type of data collection occurred through the history of patients who underwent the exam of the lactose intolerance curve, in the years 2015 to 2019, following an annual script, where the data are separated according to the age and sex of the patients. Data analysis was performed through percentage and the Tukey statistical test, thus evaluating whether there were similarities between the female or male sex and the age group. Articles from Scielo and Pubmed were used as the database for this work. Among the authors used, Barr (2013), Morais (2013) and Mattar (2010) stand out. After the analyzes, it was concluded that the number of women affected is greater than men, having relation to the number of requests, in which the number of women was greater than the number of requests from the male sex, similar to other studies. The predominant age group in males was in children aged 1 to 10 years old and in females, although the data has fluctuated considerably, the age group with the most predominance was between 26 to 50 years old. Thus, it was found that there was agreement of the results obtained in this research with similar research, carried out in Brazil and Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.064
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDigestive system and related healthFrench-language works237,207