MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3048463171

Continuidad y reinscripción: Derivas de los vivientes en las performances Los caballos no mienten de Eduardo Navarro y Que le cheval vive en moi de Marion Laval-Jeantet

2020· article· es· W3048463171 on OpenAlex
Valeria Meiller

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLiterary and Cultural Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Este articulo reflexiona sobre las performances Los caballos no mienten de Eduardo Navarro y Que le cheval vive en moi de Marion Laval-Jeantet como intervenciones artisticas que cuestionan los limites de la ontologia de los cuerpos humano y animal. Este analisis propone que ambos artistas establecen una relacion con el caballo que subvierte la separacion entre el humano y el animal para desplegar un espacio de indeterminacion de lo viviente. Despues de considerar cada performance por separado, realizo un trabajo comparativo sobre la posibilidad de estas performances de ofrecer epistemologias positivas para pensar en las lineas de continuidad entre una y otra forma de vida. En un segundo momento, reflexiono sobre los limites de esas intervenciones en tanto objetos artisticos para concluir con una reflexion acerca de la potencia biopolitica de estas obras.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.693
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicLiterary and Cultural StudiesFrench-language works237,207