MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3048504392 · doi:10.1016/j.xjtc.2020.08.003

Commentary: Thrombosis and hemorrhage, yin and yang

2020· letter· id· W3048504392 on OpenAlex
Hellmuth R. Muller Moran, Rakesh C. Arora

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJTCVS Techniques · 2020
Typeletter
Languageid
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management
Canadian institutionsResearch ManitobaSt. Boniface Hospital
FundersPfizer CanadaAbbott NutritionEdwards Lifesciences
KeywordsMedicineThrombosisAdverse effectCardiac surgeryPopulationVenous thrombosisSurgeryArteryAnemiaCardiologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The ancient Chinese yin and yang reflect the duality of universe; the dark yin is antithetical to the light yang, yet one cannot exist without the other. So too it is with thrombosis and hemorrhage in cardiac surgery. Maintaining a balance between these 2 opposed processes is necessary to successfully complete a cardiac operation, whereas too much of one (or not enough of the other) will inevitably lead to adverse events and outcomes. In no other patient population is this balance perhaps more delicate than in those who cannot receive blood products, such as patients who are a practicing Jehovah's Witness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it