Use of drug-coated balloons in the management of a recalcitrant postsurgical hepatic vein stenosis in a pediatric patient
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Drug-coated balloons (DCB) are a treatment alternative to conventional angioplasty in arterial, hemodialysis fistulas, and venous stenoses. This case report describes a child with the diagnosis of hepatoblastoma treated with chemotherapy and a right extended hepatectomy with venous reconstruction. The patient presented with signs and symptoms of portal hypertension due to a hepatic venous outflow obstruction secondary to stenosis of the surgical anastomosis. The response to conventional angioplasty was limited with frequent recurrence of symptoms. DCBs were used as an alternative prior to stent consideration aiming to assess if these devices could provide improvement of the symptoms and as a long-term therapy. The use of DCBs increased the time interval of reinterventions in comparison with conventional angioplasty. The patient eventually required stents due to recurrence of the primary disease. While this report does not provide an in-depth evaluation in terms of the efficacy and safety of DCB, this case illustrates a potential novel treatment modality to be considered for children, when stenotic venous lesions not amenable for stenting are present.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".