MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3048535914 · doi:10.17533/udea.lyl.n77a25

Brissette, P. (2005). La malédiction littéraire. Du poète crotté au genie malheureux. La maldición literaria. Del poeta andrajoso al genio desdichado. En Juan Zapata (Trad.) Bogotá (2018). Luna Libros - Fondo de Cultura Económica, 327 pp.

2020· article· es· W3048535914 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Paula Andréa Marín Colorado

Bibliographic record

VenueLingüística y Literatura · 2020
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicComparative Literary Analysis and Criticism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanitiesDictionPoetryLiterature

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Por primera vez se publica en español este libro de Pascal Brissette, profesor e investigador canadiense, director del Departamento de Lengua y Literatura Francesa de la Universidad de McGill.La traducción estuvo a cargo del profesor, investigador y traductor colombianoJuan Zapata, quien desde hace 12 años reside en Francia.Zapata ha realizado un admirable trabajo de traducción para editoriales colombianas de obras originalmente escritas en francés. Gracias a su gestión y al interés de las editoriales colombianas en publicar este tipo de trabajos, en los últimos cinco años se han publicado cincolibros invaluables para la renovación de los estudios literarios en Colombia:La institución de la literatura, de Jacques Dubois (Universidad de Antioquia, 2014), La invención del autor(Universidad de Antioquia, 2015), Posturas literarias, de Jérôme Meizoz (Universidad de los Andes, 2015), Baudelaire. De la bohemia a la modernidad literaria(Filomena Edita-Corporación Babilonia, 2017) y este de Brissette.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.089
Threshold uncertainty score0.176

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0070.004
Scholarly communication0.0080.009
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0300.018

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLingüística y LiteraturaSame topicComparative Literary Analysis and CriticismFrench-language works237,207