Algal Lymphadenitis in a Dog Caused by <i>Scenedesmus</i> Species
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A 6-year-old, spayed female Labrador/Weimaraner cross-breed dog that had previously lived in Arizona presented in Montana for an annual examination with an incidentally enlarged popliteal lymph node, which was subsequently biopsied. Histologically, the lymph node was expanded by eosinophil-rich granulomas with both extracellular and intrahistiocytic green algae. These algae had intracytoplasmic, birefringent, and refractile granules; readily formed 2 to 3 mm green colonies on Columbia blood agar medium; and ultrastructurally had a multilayered cell wall and intracytoplasmic chloroplasts. Amplified product from the internal transcribed spacer and D1/D2 regions of the 28S ribosomal RNA gene had high sequence identity to Scenedesmus sp. Despite similar infection in the retropharyngeal lymph node 1 year later, the animal remained otherwise healthy with no clinical signs. To the authors’ knowledge, this is the first case of Scenedesmus species infection in a dog and is a differential diagnosis for Coccidioides immitis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".